25 thoughts on “John Passmore on Hume: Section 1”

1. Excellent video. I wish they had more programs and shows that discussed subjects like this more often now.

2. The pure music of impure truth. The beauty of David Hume.

3. passmore dosent sound very australian. surely english educated like most educated people nowadays?

4. Care to learn how to achieve real enlightenment?Want to finally get something different?mind reading, astral projection, telekinesis, it is all real.Enter THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM and finally get what you’ve been looking for.

5. Good shit

6. I really love this video.

7. 0:37 Philosophy’s Next Top Model?

8. @Bloodlovefreak Greater than William Wallace!

9. google Doe’s Account.

10. @Myndir why dont you rub his crothch instead, eh? >;)

11. I love Magee’s gut.

12. @TheAssholearchist

    Heh, I was just reading a collection of Hume’s writings today and it turns out Passmore has written extensively on Hume. That shows how unfamiliar I was with his work(s).

13. Possibly the greatest Scot to have lived.

14. Passmore is great. His article on Logical Positivism was vital for me when I was just getting my feet wet with the movement. If he’s as knowledgeable on Hume as he was on LP, this ought to be good. Thanks for uploading this.

15. Dreams do come true… Youtube is finally apart of my homework assignments.

16. Yea, the greatest alcoholic too.

17. Big Comfy Couch

18. My pleasure!

    And to clarify what I meant by “lame” I was talking about the quality of the video, rather than it’s content.

19. And of course, it’s quite clear that you’ve “given up” in terms of saying anything substantial. Thanks for the concession of defeat, boozer.

20. LOL

    I certainly hope you really do have the excuse of being a drunkard, rather than a buffoon. Either way is plenty fine with me.

21. Quit fooling yourself. No one’s paying attention to our conversation, other than you or I (Of course, I’m guessing you’re cowardly enough to report it as spam).

    I’ve happened to be quite drunk, on every response that I’ve made to you.

    I’m just going to keep you talking, until you give up.

    Welcome to the internets, you grumpy Norwegian…or whatever.

22. Maybe you need a hanky, since you apparently feel that you’re taking such a horrible beating, or hold to some vain hope of convincing others of this.

    There is a great difference between a personal attack and a statement of fact which happens to hit a nerve. Every bit of “hostility” follows directly from your inane tripe, and absent this would not be needed. Nothing personal.

    The objective substance is plain for all to see, whereas your only response is yet another fallacy, the tu quoque.

23. The problem with your evidence is that it lacks any sort of objective substance.

    You don’t want to stop there. You follow up with a critique of my ad hominem attacks by producing your own.

    Why are you so hostile? Maybe you need a hug.

24. I presume nothing. Your moronic behaviour is amply evident in your thinking that you can get away with a one-word review, a false dichotomy, and now irrelevant ad hominem attacks.

    But by all means, do please continue to make yourself look like an utter fool.

25. The fact that you presume that I presume that there is only one alternative is absolutely indicative of abject stupidity.

    What’s worse is the fact that it indicates your willingness to marry a strawman and walk down the aisle.

    Quit pretending to have an iota of intelligence. You’re a fraud.

    Game. Set. Match.

Comments are closed.